Lindsey Graham Proposes Nationwide 15-Week Abortion Ban | united states politics

Sen. Lindsey Graham was proposing legislation Tuesday to ban 15 weeks of abortion nationwide, a politically risky move as backlash grows to the Supreme Court ruling earlier this summer that struck down federal protections for abortion. process.

Surveys show that 57% of Americans disapproved june court reversal of the 1973 Roe v Wade ruling guarantee access to abortion, with 62% saying the procedure should be legal in all or most cases.

The proposal by Graham, a hardline Republican from South Carolina, will be called the “Pain Capable Unborn Children Protection from Late-Term Abortion Act.” It has almost no chance of becoming law, but analysts see it as an attempt to frame the discussion on abortion, with less than 60 days until the midterm elections.

Republicans in the states including South Carolina have seen recent efforts to introduce abortion bans fail, and Democrats will surely use Graham’s push to ignite their base and repeat previous warnings that the agenda of his opponents has always been the quest to ban abortion at the national level.

Earlier versions of Graham’s bill have banned abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, but at a press conference on Tuesday unveiled a proposed ban that goes into effect after 15 weeks, an attempt to align federal law with Florida.

Graham’s previous proposals contained exceptions for rape, incest and to protect the life of the mother, which Florida law does not.

Even if Republicans take control of the House in November, their bill is unlikely to pass because current Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has indicated it would be unwilling to lift obstructionism -a process that requires a bill to win the support of 60 senators- for the issue of abortion.

McConnell, and republicans they have generally taken note of developments since the fall of Roe v Wade. While nine Republican-controlled states moved quickly to enact abortion bans, others have seen significant backlash.

In Kansas, a staunchly conservative state, voters last month rejected restrictions on abortion by a wide margin, and abortion advocates recorded a notable victory earlier this month when the Michigan supreme court ruled 5-2 that the fate of the abortion ban would be in the hands of the midterm electorate instead of the state legislature.

Democratic candidates have capitalized on the apparent momentum. In Pennsylvania, Senate candidate John Fetterman said a weekend rally that the right to abortion was at the top of their agenda. “Women are the reason we can win. Don’t piss off women,” she said.

According to research by TargetSmart, a survey analytics company, Pennsylvania ranks fifth among states showing large gaps in the number of registrations between men and women since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.

Meanwhile, a growing number of Republican candidates running for the November midterm elections have been softening your posture on abortion in an attempt to shore up votes.

They include Senate candidate Blake Masters of Arizona, whose campaign website once declared that he supported a “federal personality law” and was “100% pro-life.” His website now reads: “Protect babies, don’t let them kill them,” followed by “Democrats lie about my views on abortion.”

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B Anthony Pro-Life America group that promotes Graham’s legislation, said in a sentence that “Radical Democrats [are] pushing an extreme agenda of abortion on demand up to birth, paid for by taxpayers, leaving countless unborn babies and mothers unprotected from the violence of abortion.”

He called on Congress to “find consensus on a minimum federal standard that reflects the values ​​of the overwhelming majority of Americans,” citing a Harvard Harris Poll June that suggested 79% of Americans wanted abortions limited to 15 weeks.

However, the same poll also found that 55% opposed reversal of Roe v Wade.

Leave a Comment